සැකිල්ල:Editnotices/Page/විකිපීඩියා:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Before posting, please be sure to include any of the following information that is available:

1. Source. The book or web page being used as the source. If it's a book, please include author, title, publisher, page number, etc. If it's an online source, please link to it. For example: [http://www.website.com/webpage.html]. 2. Article. The Wikipedia article(s) in which it is being used. For example: [[Article name]]. 3. Content. The exact statement(s) or other content in the article that the source is supporting. Please supply a WP:DIFF or put the content inside block quotes. For example: <blockquote>text</blockquote>. Many sources are reliable for statement "X" but unreliable for statement "Y".

Before starting an RfC please consider: is your question a one-off, or is it project-wide? Is it about reliability or prominence? A question of the form "is X source reliable for Y content on Z article" should normally be addressed at the article's talk page, but you can post a note here. Questions concerning the use of sources that would generally be considered reliable, for specific content, probably belong at the neutral point of view noticeboard. Do not base your RfC solely on සැකිල්ල:Rspe, as it is not a reliable source.

If adding a subsection called discussion please add the sources names in brackets/parentheses, to disambiguate if there are multiple discussions.