"විකිපීඩියා:සංගණ්‍යත්වය" හි සංශෝධන අතර වෙනස්කම්

විකිපීඩියා වෙතින්
Browse history interactively
← පැරණි සංස්කරණනව සංස්කරණ →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
සුළු රොබෝ ඉවත් කරමින්: hy:Վիքիփեդիա:Նշանակալիություն (missing)
සුළු රොබෝ එකතු කරමින්: is,jv,sah,or,no,kk ඉවත් කරමින්: hy:Վիքիփեդիա:Նշանակալիություն (missing)
1 පේළිය: 1 පේළිය:
{{පිණ්ඩාර්ථය|විකිපීඩියාවේ ලිපි වෙතින් ආවරණය කරනුයේ— කාලසීමාවක් ඇතුලතදී සමස්ත වශයෙන් ලෝකය විසින් සැලකිය යුතු තරම් වැදගත් අවධානයක් යොමුකරගත් සහ [[WP:විකිපීඩියාව කුමක් නොවන්නේද|වෙනත් හේතූන් නිසා බැහැරකොට නොමැති]]— ''සංගණ්‍ය මාතෘකා'' වෙති. මෙම අවධානය කොපමණදැයි ආමානය කිරීම (මැන බැලීම) සඳහා ප්‍රකාශිත ජර්නල, පොත්, සහ පුවත්පත් වැනි [[WP:RS|විශ්වසනීය]] [[WP:ස්වාධීන මූලාශ්‍ර|ස්වාධීන මූලාශ්‍රයන්ගෙන්]] ලබා ගන්නා සාක්ෂ්‍ය අප මේ සඳහා සැලකිල්ලට ගනිමු. පිටු වල අන්තර්ගතය කෙරෙහි සංගණ්‍යත්වය විසින් සෘජු බලපෑම් ඇති නොකරන අතර, එය විසින් තීරණය කෙරෙන්නේ කිසියම් මාතෘකාවක් සඳහා ස්වීය ලිපියක් තැනිය යුතුද යන්න පමණයි.}}
<noinclude>{{pp-semi-indef}}</noinclude>
{{සංගණ්‍යත්වමාර්ගෝපදේශනය}}
{{dablink|This page is about Notability guidelines. For the Notability noticeboard see [[WP:N/N]]. For Neutral point of view, see [[WP:NPOV]]. For Not now information page, see [[WP:NOTNOW]]. For what Wikipedia is not, see [[WP:NOT]]. For Citations, see [[WP:CITE]]. For Footnotes, see [[WP:FOOT]]}}
විකිපීඩියාවේදී එය යෙදෙන ආකාරයට, '''සංගණ්‍යත්වය''' යනු යම්කිසි මාතෘකාවක් සඳහා ස්වීයවූ ලිපියක් තිබිය හැකිද යන්න තීරණය කිරීමට සංස්කාරකවරුන් විසින් භාවිතා කරන පරික්ෂණයකි. විකිපීඩියාවෙහි තොරතුරු ඒවායේ [[WP:V|සත්‍යෝක්ෂ්‍යතාව]] මත යැපෙයි; කිසියම් මාතෘකාවක් පිළිබඳ විශ්වසනීය [[WP:තෙවන පාර්ශවය|තෙවන-පාර්ශව]] මූලාශ්‍ර සපයා ගත නොහැකි නම්, එය සඳහා වෙන්වූ ලිපියක් තිබිය යුතු නොවේ. මාතෘකාවන් [[WP:IINFO|වගවිභාගයක් නොමැතිව අන්තර්ග්‍රහණයකිරීම]] වැළැක්වීමට විකිපීඩියාවෙහි සංගණ්‍යත්ව සංකල්පය විසින් මෙම මූලික ප්‍රමිතිය භාවිතා කරයි. ලිපි හා ලැයිස්තු මාතෘකා, සංගණ්‍ය ඒවා හෝ "සැලකිල්ලක් දැක්වීමට තරම් යෝග්‍ය" ඒවා හෝ විය යුතුයි. සංගණ්‍යත්වය සමාපනය කිරීම ප්‍රසිද්ධිය, වැදගත් බව, හෝ ජනප්‍රියක්වය වැනි දේ මත ''අනිවාර්යයෙන්ම'' නොයැපෙතත් —පහත විස්තර කෙරෙන මාර්ගෝපදේශන සපුරාලන කිසියම් විෂයයක් අන්තර්ග්‍රහණය කිරීමේ හැකියාව එම ගුණාංග විසින් ඉහළ දමනු ලැබිය හැක.
{{ redirect3|WP:Importance|For article importance within a WikiProject see [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic|Importance of topic]]}}

{{Notabilityguide}}
{{subcat guideline|notability guideline|Notability|WP:N|WP:NN|WP:NOTE}}
{{nutshell|Wikipedia covers ''notable topics''—those that have been "noticed" to a significant degree by [[WP:Independent sources|independent sources]]. A topic is deemed appropriate for inclusion as a standalone article if it complies with [[WP:NOT]] and has received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]]. Notability does not directly affect the content of articles, but only their existence.}}
{{notice|'''If you want to ask advice whether an article topic is likely to be notable''' please visit the [[Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard|notability noticeboard]].}}


On Wikipedia, '''notability''' determines whether a topic merits its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be [[WP:V|verifiable]]; if no reliable [[WP:Third party|third-party]] sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid [[WP:IINFO|indiscriminate inclusion]] of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not ''necessarily'' depend on things like fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.

A topic is [[rebuttable presumption|presumed to]] merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines below and is not excluded by [[WP:NOT]]. A topic can also be considered notable if it meets the criteria outlined in any of the subject-specific guidelines listed in the box on the right.

These notability guidelines only outline how suitable a ''topic'' is for ''its own article or list''. They ''do not'' directly limit the ''content'' of an article or list. For Wikipedia's policies regarding content, see [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]], [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]], [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]], and [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Biographies of living persons]].

== General notability guideline ==
{{shortcut|WP:GNG|WP:SIGCOV}}
If a topic has received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]] of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.

* ''"Significant coverage"'' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]] is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.<ref>Examples: The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on [[IBM]] are plainly non-trivial. The one sentence mention by Walker of the band ''Three Blind Mice'' in a biography of [[Bill Clinton]] ({{cite news|title=Tough love child of Kennedy|author=Martin Walker|date=[[1992-01-06]]|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1240962,00.html}}) is plainly trivial.</ref>
* ''"Reliable"'' means sources need editorial integrity to allow [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] evaluation of notability, per [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|the reliable source guideline]]. Sources may encompass [[Publication|published]] works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
* ''"Sources,"''<ref>Including '''but not limited to''' newspapers, books and e-books, magazines, television and radio documentaries, reports by government agencies, and scientific journals. In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a comprehensive article. Sources are ''not'' required to be available online, and they are ''not'' required to be in English.</ref> for notability purposes, should be [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]], as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected.<ref>Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. Mere republications of a single source or news wire service do not always constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing articles in the same geographic region about an occurrence, does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Specifically, several journals publishing the same article within the same geographic region from a news wire service is not a multiplicity of works.</ref> Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
* ''"Independent of the subject"'' excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, [[WP:SPS|self-published]] material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.<ref>Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability. See also: [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] for handling of such situations.</ref>
* ''"Presumed"'' means that significant coverage [[WP:RS|in reliable sources]] establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not appropriate for a stand-alone article. For example, such an article may violate [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]].<ref>Moreover, not all coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].</ref>

A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice, and satisfies one of the criteria for a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia. Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article.

== <span id="NCONTENT" />Notability guidelines do not limit content within an article ==
{{Shortcut|WP:NNC|WP:N#NCONTENT|WP:NLISTITEM}}
The criteria applied to article content are not the same as those applied to article creation. The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people). Content coverage within a given article or list is governed by the principle of [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and other content policies. For additional information about list articles, see [[#Notability and lists|Notability and lists]] and [[WP:LSC|Lead and selection criteria]].

== <span id="NRVE" /><span id="OBJ" /> Notability requires verifiable evidence ==
{{Shortcut|WP:NRVE}}
The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention to support a claim of notability.

The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere [[WP:NOT#NEWS|short-term interest]], nor a result of [[#SPIP|promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity]], nor is the topic unsuitable for [[WP:NOT|any other reason]]. Sources of evidence include recognized peer reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally.

Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Notability requires only the ''existence'' of suitable reliable sources, not their immediate [[WP:CITE|citation]]. Wikipedia articles are [[WP:IMPERFECT|not a final draft]], and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate.

== <span id="TEMP" />Notability is not temporary ==
{{Shortcut|WP:N#TEMP|WP:NTEMP}}
{{anchor|TEMP|is not temporary}}Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.

However, {{anchor|SBST}}[[WP:NOTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a news source]]: it takes more than just routine [[WP:NOT#NEWS|news reports]] about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and [[Tabloid_journalism#To_refer_to_sensationalist_journalistic_practices|tabloid journalism]] is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The Wikimedia project [[wikinews:Main page|Wikinews]] covers topics of present news coverage. For guidelines on whether an event is notable, see [[Wikipedia:Notability (events)]].

While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time re-assessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a [[WP:AFD|deletion discussion]], or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. As a result articles may be proposed for deletion or recreated months or even years after being earlier considered.

In particular, if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, [[WP:BLP1E|we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual]].

== <span id="SPIP" />Self-promotion and indiscriminate publicity ==
{{Shortcut|WP:SPIP}}
Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability:

Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. Self-promotion, paid material, autobiography, and product placement are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it&nbsp;– ''without'' incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.

Neutral sources are also needed to guarantee a [[WP:NPOV|neutral article]] can be written—self-published sources cannot be assumed neutral; see [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] and [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] for discussion of neutrality concerns of such sources. Even ''non''-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still ''not'' evidence of notability as they do not measure the ''attention a subject has received''.

== Notability and stand-alone lists ==
{{Under discussion |section|comment= See [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Inclusion criteria for Lists]] for the RFC this is attempting to summarize. }}
Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a [[WP:SALAT|stand-alone list]]. There is no present consensus for other means of forming stand-alone lists, and editors are urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.

== Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines ==
{{Shortcut|WP:FAILN}}

Articles on topics that do not meet this criterion are generally deleted, although there are alternatives.

For articles of ''unclear'' notability, deletion should be a last resort.

If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:
*Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject<ref>Sometimes contacting the subject of a biography or the representative of a subject organization will yield independent source material. Of course we have to be careful to observe and evaluate independence. You might also see if there is a wikipedia project related to the topic, and ask for help there.</ref> for advice on where to look for sources.
*Put the {{tl|notability}} tag on the article to alert other editors.
*If the article is about a specialized field, use the {{tl|expert-subject|PROJECT-NAME}} tag with a specific [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] not available online.

If appropriate sources ''cannot be found'' after a good-faith search for them, consider [[Help:Merging and moving pages|merging]] the article's verifiable content into a broader article providing context.<ref>For instance, articles on minor characters in a work of fiction may be merged into a "list of minor characters in ..."; articles on schools may be merged into articles on the towns or regions where schools are located; relatives of a famous person may be merged into the article on the person; articles on persons only notable for being associated with a certain group or event may be merged into the main article on that group or event.</ref> Otherwise, if deleting:<ref>Wikipedia editors have been known to reject nominations for deletion that have been inadequately researched. Research should include attempts to find sources which might demonstrate notability, and/or information which would demonstrate notability in another manner.</ref>
*If the article meets our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], one can use a criterion-specific deletion tag listed on that page.
*Use the {{tl|prod}} tag, for articles which do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but are uncontroversial deletion candidates. This allows the article to be deleted after seven days if nobody objects. For more information, see [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion]].
*For cases where you are unsure about deletion or believe others might object, nominate the article for the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for seven days.

For articles on subjects that are ''clearly'' not notable, then deletion is usually the most appropriate response, although other options may help the community to [[WP:PRESERVE|preserve any useful material]].

== See also ==
*Wikipedia's article on [[Notability in Wikipedia]].
*For commentary and discussion of this guideline, see [[:Category:Wikipedia essays on notability]].
*For notability guidelines for specific kinds of articles, see [[:Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines]]

== Notes ==
{{Reflist|2}}




== සටහන්==
{{ආශ්‍රලැයිස්තුව|2}}
<!-- essays and the like should go in the category below, which serves as a general list of 'related issues' -->
<!-- essays and the like should go in the category below, which serves as a general list of 'related issues' -->
{{විකිපීඩියා ප්‍රතිපත්ති සහ මාර්ගෝපදේශන}}
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}


[[ප්‍රවර්ගය:විකිපීඩියා සංගණ්‍යත්වය|*]]
[[Category:Wikipedia notability|*]]
[[ප්‍රවර්ගය:විකිපීඩියා සංගණ්‍යත්ව මාර්ගෝපදේශනය|*]]
[[Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines|*]]
[[Category:WikiProject notability essays|*]]


[[af:Wikipedia:Ensiklopediese relevansie]]
[[af:Wikipedia:Ensiklopediese relevansie]]
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:ملحوظية]]
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:ملحوظية]]
[[an:Wikipedia:Criterios d'almesibilidat d'articlos]]
[[as:ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা]]
[[bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা]]
[[bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা]]
[[be-x-old:Вікіпэдыя:Значнасьць]]
[[be-x-old:Вікіпэдыя:Значнасьць]]
107 පේළිය: 25 පේළිය:
[[et:Vikipeedia:Tähelepanuväärsus]]
[[et:Vikipeedia:Tähelepanuväärsus]]
[[el:Βικιπαίδεια:Εγκυκλοπαιδικότητα]]
[[el:Βικιπαίδεια:Εγκυκλοπαιδικότητα]]
[[en:Wikipedia:Notability]]
[[es:Wikipedia:Artículos sin relevancia aparente]]
[[es:Wikipedia:Artículos sin relevancia aparente]]
[[eo:Vikipedio:Menciindeco]]
[[eo:Vikipedio:Menciindeco]]
[[fa:ویکی‌پدیا:سرشناسی]]
[[fa:ویکی‌پدیا:سرشناسی]]
[[fr:Wikipédia:Critères d'admissibilité des articles]]
[[fr:Wikipédia:Critères d'admissibilité des articles]]
[[jv:Wikipedia:Kelayakan artikel]]
[[kk:Уикипедия:Маңыздылық]]
[[ko:위키백과:저명성]]
[[ko:위키백과:저명성]]
[[hi:विकिपीडिया:उल्लेखनीयता]]
[[hr:Wikipedija:Kriteriji]]
[[hr:Wikipedija:Kriteriji]]
[[id:Wikipedia:Kelayakan artikel]]
[[id:Wikipedia:Kelayakan artikel]]
[[is:Wikipedia:Markvert efni]]
[[it:Aiuto:Cosa mettere su Wikipedia]]
[[it:Aiuto:Cosa mettere su Wikipedia]]
[[he:ויקיפדיה:הבהרת חשיבות]]
[[lt:Vikipedija:Reikšmingumas]]
[[lt:Vikipedija:Reikšmingumas]]
[[hu:Wikipédia:Nevezetesség]]
[[hu:Wikipédia:Nevezetesség]]
[[mk:Википедија:Значајност]]
[[mk:Википедија:Значајност]]
[[ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:ശ്രദ്ധേയത]]
[[ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:ശ്രദ്ധേയത]]
[[mr:विकिपीडिया:उल्लेखनीयता]]
[[ms:Wikipedia:Kepentingan rencana]]
[[ms:Wikipedia:Kelayakan]]
[[nl:Wikipedia:Relevantie]]
[[nl:Wikipedia:Relevantie]]
[[ja:Wikipedia:特筆性]]
[[ja:Wikipedia:特筆性]]
[[no:Wikipedia:Relevanskriterier/kladd fra svensk Wikipedia]]
[[oc:Wikipèdia:Critèris d'admissibilitat dels articles]]
[[or:ଉଇକିପିଡ଼ିଆ:Notability]]
[[pl:Wikipedia:Encyklopedyczność]]
[[pl:Wikipedia:Encyklopedyczność]]
[[pt:Wikipedia:Critérios de notoriedade]]
[[pt:Wikipédia:Critérios de notoriedade]]
[[ro:Wikipedia:Notabilitate]]
[[ro:Wikipedia:Notabilitate]]
[[ru:Википедия:Значимость]]
[[ru:Википедия:Значимость]]
[[sah:Бикипиэдьийэ:Суолта]]
[[sk:Wikipédia:Wikipedická významnosť]]
[[sk:Wikipédia:Wikipedická významnosť]]
[[sl:Wikipedija:Pomembnost]]
[[sl:Wikipedija:Pomembnost]]

11:24, 28 ජූනි 2012 තෙක් සංශෝධනය

සංගණ්‍යත්වය
විෂය-විශේෂිත මාර්ගෝපදේශන
මෙයද බලන්න

විකිපීඩියාවේදී එය යෙදෙන ආකාරයට, සංගණ්‍යත්වය යනු යම්කිසි මාතෘකාවක් සඳහා ස්වීයවූ ලිපියක් තිබිය හැකිද යන්න තීරණය කිරීමට සංස්කාරකවරුන් විසින් භාවිතා කරන පරික්ෂණයකි. විකිපීඩියාවෙහි තොරතුරු ඒවායේ සත්‍යෝක්ෂ්‍යතාව මත යැපෙයි; කිසියම් මාතෘකාවක් පිළිබඳ විශ්වසනීය තෙවන-පාර්ශව මූලාශ්‍ර සපයා ගත නොහැකි නම්, එය සඳහා වෙන්වූ ලිපියක් තිබිය යුතු නොවේ. මාතෘකාවන් වගවිභාගයක් නොමැතිව අන්තර්ග්‍රහණයකිරීම වැළැක්වීමට විකිපීඩියාවෙහි සංගණ්‍යත්ව සංකල්පය විසින් මෙම මූලික ප්‍රමිතිය භාවිතා කරයි. ලිපි හා ලැයිස්තු මාතෘකා, සංගණ්‍ය ඒවා හෝ "සැලකිල්ලක් දැක්වීමට තරම් යෝග්‍ය" ඒවා හෝ විය යුතුයි. සංගණ්‍යත්වය සමාපනය කිරීම ප්‍රසිද්ධිය, වැදගත් බව, හෝ ජනප්‍රියක්වය වැනි දේ මත අනිවාර්යයෙන්ම නොයැපෙතත් —පහත විස්තර කෙරෙන මාර්ගෝපදේශන සපුරාලන කිසියම් විෂයයක් අන්තර්ග්‍රහණය කිරීමේ හැකියාව එම ගුණාංග විසින් ඉහළ දමනු ලැබිය හැක.


සටහන්

"https://si.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=විකිපීඩියා:සංගණ්‍යත්වය&oldid=215047" වෙතින් සම්ප්‍රවේශනය කෙරිණි